Nebulum StudiosNebulumStudios
← The Journal
FulfillmentNovember 22, 2025·8 min read

Jack of All Trades or Master of One? Finding Your Path

By Nebulum

Jack of All Trades or Master of One? Finding Your Path

Episode 6 of The Nebulum Podcast with Zale and Grant

There’s a persistent narrative in our culture: if you want to be truly successful, you need to focus. Pick one thing. Go deep. Specialize. Become the absolute best in one narrow niche.

Thanks for reading! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

And there’s truth to that path. But what if you’re someone who’s drawn to multiple things? What if variety isn’t a distraction—it’s actually how you thrive? What if cycling between different interests isn’t lack of commitment, but a different kind of mastery?

That’s what we explored in this episode: the tension between breadth and depth, and why the answer isn’t one-size-fits-all.

The Pressure to Choose

We’ve all felt it. From the moment you choose a college major, there’s this implicit (and sometimes explicit) pressure to pick one thing and stick with it. This is your specialization. This is your path. This is who you are.

But what if you play multiple sports? What if you’re interested in music AND coding AND philosophy? What if you genuinely enjoy cycling through different activities, diving deep for a while, then switching to something else, only to return to the first thing later?

For many people, this feels like a problem to solve. Like something’s wrong with them for not being able to “just pick one thing.”

Here’s the truth: we are different. Each person is fundamentally unique. And whenever there’s blanket advice—no matter how well-intentioned—you have to take it with a grain of salt. There’s usually value in the advice, but you need to extract what fits YOUR story, YOUR resonance, YOUR path to fulfillment.

The Hidden Benefits of Breadth

Let’s start by acknowledging the obvious: yes, if you split your time 50-50 between chess and cycling, you’ll probably be better at chess if you spend 100% of your time on chess. That’s just math.

But here’s what that simple calculation misses:

1. The 80-20 Principle There’s a point in any skill where you reach “good enough”—maybe not world-class, but skilled, competent, able to engage at a high level. Often, you can reach 80% of the result with 20% of the effort. After that, the returns become marginal. Going from good to great takes exponentially more time than going from nothing to good.

So what if, instead of spending years trying to go from 90% to 95% in one thing, you reach 80% in five different things? Now you have five high-level skills instead of one marginally better one.

2. Rest Is Growth When you focus intensely on one thing for too long, you hit diminishing returns—not just in skill development, but in energy and creativity. Your brain gets fatigued. The magic often happens when you step away.

Cycling between different activities isn’t distraction; it’s recovery. While you’re actively working on one thing, your brain is passively processing the other things you’ve been working on. Solutions emerge. Connections form. Growth happens in the rest periods.

3. Cross-Pollination of Skills This is where it gets really interesting. Skills from one domain inform and enhance skills in other domains. Playing music teaches you about rhythm and timing, which helps with coding. Sports teach you about discipline and body awareness, which helps with everything. Philosophy trains clear thinking, which makes you better at business.

When you develop multiple skills, you’re not just collecting random abilities—you’re building a unique synthesis. You start seeing patterns across domains. You develop what one might call “different ways of seeing.” And these different perspectives become your competitive advantage.

The Renaissance Person Is Not Dead

We tend to think of polymaths—people skilled in multiple fields—as relics of the past. The classic “Renaissance man” who could sculpt, do mathematics, and play tennis.

But look closer at successful people today, and you’ll often find they’re good at multiple things. We just tend to know them for one thing because that’s what gets highlighted. When someone does something great, that achievement gets amplified, and we associate them with that singular accomplishment.

Take the founder of Patreon, for example—he’s also a professional musician in the band Pomplamoose. He’s excelling in both music AND tech entrepreneurship. Or look at the countless engineers who are also athletes, artists who understand business, scientists who write beautifully.

The polymath isn’t dead. We just don’t always recognize it because we’re conditioned to see people through the lens of their primary achievement.

Finding Your Balance: Mental Models

So how do you actually navigate this? How do you develop breadth without sacrificing all depth?

Model 1: Bundle and Go Deep Choose a set of related things and treat them as one category. Then go deep in that category. For example: “I’m going deep into creative expression,” which includes music production, visual design, and writing. These aren’t three separate things—they’re three facets of one larger pursuit.

Model 2: Spiral Deeper Cycle through your interests, but each time you return to something, you go a layer deeper. You’re getting deeper in this thing, then deeper in that thing, then deeper in another thing. It’s not scattered—it’s a deliberate spiral of increasing mastery across multiple domains.

Model 3: Follow Resonance Don’t overthink the categorization. Simply do what resonates in each moment. Trust that there’s a thread connecting your interests, even if you can’t articulate it yet. Sometimes the pattern reveals itself only in hindsight.

The key insight: identity can be constricting. Maybe your mind works better when you just go with what resonates rather than trying to label and organize everything into a neat system.

The Common Thread

Here’s what makes the difference between being scattered and being strategically multi-skilled: finding the common thread that connects your interests.

When you can identify the through-line—the deeper pattern that links your various pursuits—they stop being separate things. They become different expressions of the same underlying path.

Maybe all your interests are connected by creativity. Or systems thinking. Or helping people. Or physical mastery. Or understanding complexity. Whatever it is, when you find that thread, your “many things” become one coherent journey.

This is how you avoid spreading yourself too thin. You’re not doing five unrelated things in five different directions. You’re exploring five related dimensions of one unified path.

Variety Really Is the Spice of Life

Let’s be honest: for some people, deep specialization feels suffocating. Doing the same thing day after day, year after year, even if you’re getting incrementally better, just doesn’t feel alive.

If that’s you, honor it. Variety isn’t a weakness—it’s how you stay engaged, energized, and creative. It’s how you avoid burnout. It’s how you maintain the joy and resonance that makes life worth living.

The question isn’t whether variety is good or bad. It’s whether it serves your fulfillment. And only you can answer that.

The Real Trade-Off

Both paths are valuable. Both can lead to high performance and fulfillment.

Going deep in one thing allows you to see patterns and nuances that generalists miss. You develop true expertise. You can achieve recognition and success in that specific domain.

Developing breadth across multiple things gives you versatility, adaptability, and unique perspectives. You become someone who can synthesize ideas across fields, someone who brings unexpected solutions because you draw from a wider pool of experience.

The real question is: what’s your ratio? How much breadth, how much depth?

Too much breadth and you have zero depth—you’re skimming the surface of everything and mastering nothing. That’s not useful.

Too much depth and you have zero breadth—you become so specialized that you lose perspective, flexibility, and the ability to adapt. That’s also limiting.

The sweet spot is somewhere in the middle, and it’s deeply personal. Your sweet spot might be very different from someone else’s, and that’s exactly as it should be.

Your Experiment

This isn’t about following a formula. It’s about experimentation and self-discovery. It’s about listening to yourself and noticing what makes you feel most alive, most engaged, most fulfilled.

Here are the questions to carry with you:

What patterns can you notice across the multiple things you do? Even if your interests seem unrelated on the surface, what connects them at a deeper level? What skills transfer? What underlying drive or curiosity links them?

What cycles do you notice yourself going through? Do you naturally rotate between certain activities? Do you need breaks from one thing before you can dive back in? These cycles aren’t random—they’re revealing something about how you’re wired.

The key is learning to move WITH your natural rhythms rather than resisting them. When you fight your cycles, you create friction. When you embrace them, you find flow.

A Final Thought

We live in a world that loves to categorize people. Specialist or generalist. Deep or broad. Focused or scattered.

But real life is messier and more interesting than these binary choices suggest. You can be someone who goes deep in multiple things. You can cycle through interests and still develop mastery. You can be a Renaissance person in the 21st century.

The path to fulfillment isn’t about fitting into someone else’s model of success. It’s about understanding yourself deeply enough to design a life that actually resonates with who you are.

So if you’re someone who’s always felt weird about having multiple interests, about not being able to “just pick one thing,” consider this: maybe there’s nothing wrong with you. Maybe you’re exactly the kind of person the world needs—someone who can see connections others miss, someone who brings different ways of seeing to everything you do.

Both paths are valuable. Both can lead to extraordinary lives.

The question is: which one is yours?


The Nebulum Podcast explores fulfillment, personal growth, and living authentically. Hosted by Zale and Grant, we’re creating a space for honest conversations about finding your path and building a life that resonates.

Your Turn: Are you more naturally inclined toward specialization or breadth? How have you navigated this tension in your own life? What patterns have you noticed across your various interests?

We’d love to hear your thoughts in the comments.

Thanks for reading! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

Jack of All Trades or Master of One? Finding Your Path

Listen to the episode

Jack of All Trades or Master of One? Finding Your Path

The Nebulum Podcast · EP 6 · 40 min